Since following the Kryon writings, one of the most striking things I've noticed is that information concerning science "stuff" becomes available at about the same time we humans are able to put it together. Because it has historically taken such a long time for things to get published in the scientific arena (anywhere from one to ten years!), it's just amazing to me that the Kryon group has remained so true to its word - that information would never be provided to us that would change our free will, or disturb our own "discovery patterns."

Besides all the political/power hoopla surrounding who and what gets published that stymies public release (boy-o-boy, that's a treatise all to itself), it takes roughly a one-year period (on average) for studies to be created, approved, conducted, analyzed, and written up. The write-up is then submitted to journals and magazines, at which time the article may or may not be accepted for publication. If accepted, then reviewers' comments must be included and changes made before the editors will accept the final version for printing.

Last but not least, when the final version is ready, it can take another three to twelve months for the poor thing to finally make it into print. I say all this to bring home the point that the Kryon group somehow "knows" what scientists are doing worldwide, at the time the information becomes available, yet hasn't made it into the mainstream - but then again, I suppose a group of angels could do such a thing! Yet, in another observation, I find that with the advent of the internet, not to mention its effect on print media (newspapers, magazines, etc.), it has been quite an interesting ride over the last five to six years - scientific information is hitting public airwaves faster than anything I've ever seen before, and it's all clearly by-passing the slower, older way of dissemination. Things are truly speeding up in this area...

Another thing I've noticed is that not only does the Kryon group report on advances in-progress, they offer hints about where to look for unpredicted discoveries that no one could have figured were ever on the agenda - for instance, gamma ray "discoveries" (see below). Yet it really doesn't have to be "science" for the Kryon group to do such a thing. I have to say the coolest piece of information from the Kryon I've come across lately, and then seen happen so soon, was a statement that we would soon see (within a generation or so) our political elections happen in an "instant polling."

Now, it's obvious that hasn't happened yet, but our present election situation has the entire U.S.A. calling for updated and more accurate voting procedures. Who could have predicted this dead-heat presidential election would have happened, or that the central issue would be the accurate accounting of individual votes? Regardless of the problems that may come with electronic, "instant" polling, I truly believe we're headed in that direction.

Gamma Rays, The Big Bang, and the Speed of Light

Gamma Rays. Well, back to science, proper. Since we're on issues that no one could have foreseen, I'd like to start with the gamma ray stuff. Back in 1994, Kryon Book II contained a statement that we should watch gamma ray activity for information about spiritual things. Now, I remember discussions on the Kryon internet message board about how gamma rays have been known about for years, so what was the big deal? Then, on December 14, 1997 a titantic explosion poured a torrent of gamma rays into space, which astronomers called "the most powerful explosion since the Big Bang."1 George Djorgovski of the California Institute of Technology said, "for about one or two seconds, this burst was as luminous as all the rest of the entire universe." He also said, "the burst created conditions like those in the early universe, about one millisecond (1/1,000 of a second) after the Big Bang."2 Now, it's quite interesting that about three years before such a thing happened, the Kryon group had said to watch for it. In addition, after we'd noted and measured it (that is, our scientists did), the Kryon group sure had a whopper of an explanation as to what the real reason was for all this! The Kryon group said it most assuredly was the beginning of another universe within the one we can already see and measure, and that it had our energy stamp on it. Woah. Okay, so you mean good ol' George Djorgovski wasn't far off in his assessment? And it's quite reasonable to assume we really did just see a honest-to-goodness Big Bang?

The Big Bang(s) and the Speed of Light.

Which brings me to another question, just how many Big Bangs are (were) there? You know, here's a small aside that's quite personal for me. For some time now, I've had the sneaking suspicion that the theory of a single, orgasmic-like Big Bang is one big mistaken idea. For instance, how to explain all the conflicting information over the years from astronomers concerning red-shift data collected from different parts of the observable universe? Red-shift data comes from a spectral light technique used to estimate the distance from Earth to far-away regions of the universe. This technique relies on the assumption that the speed of light is an absolute constant. I've also had a sneaking suspicion that the good ol' speed of light is not constant, yet I've had nothing to hang my hat on, at least until now. Viola! Scientists from around the world have simultaneously been releasing information that all ties together - but they don't know it yet! But somehow the Kryon group does...it's sort of an "early warning" system to read the Kryon writings...but I digress.

How to tie this together? Let's see. Red-shift is based on the assumption that places in the universe that are distant from us should be moving away at great speeds, and thus they will emit light at lower, or redder, frequencies. Thus, distance and frequency, in this model, are based on the speed of light "constant" in a very dependent way. Now comes three very interesting pieces of different, yet related, information:

1) The recent gamma ray "explosion" should be much farther away from us based on the shear amount of energy that reached us, and should be showing red-shift as well, but does not (which suggests it's quite close).3

2) The speed of light has been questioned on two fronts: (a) using cesium gas chambers, the speed of light has been broken by a magnitude of 300 times, 4 and (b) solid evidence of quantum teleportation (instantaneous communication at the atomic level) from numerous laboratories has recently been released. 5

3) The universe is now assumed to be speeding up, based on the red-shift data from the furthest reaches of our universe (instead of slowing down as gravity, and a single Big Bang event, would dictate).6

Three pieces of information suggest that we are way off base concerning our theories about what's really going on. So what could all this mean? I propose that all of the above suggests we're measuring different time frames at different places. I also propose that the very postulate the Kryon group put forth awhile back - that the farthest places in the universe are closer to us than it would appear - is based on the fact that the speed of light is not absolute and instead varies with the time frame of its area of the universe. Indeed, I propose that if we were to take this astronomical data and pair it with the assumption that the speed of light is variable, we'd soon be able to classify different parts of the universe by their time frames. Different time frames suggest different Big Bangs!!! The many time frames we would identify could then give us an index of how many Big Bangs have occurred so far...ahem. Just a suggestion.

CONTINUED LATER THIS YEAR...

References

1 "Gamma ray burst makes quite a bang,"

by R. Cowen. Science News - May 9, 1998, Vol. 153(19).

2 "Most powerful explosion since the Big Bang challenges gamma ray burst theories,"

Science Daily - May 6,1998, Source: National Aeronautic and Space Administration,

http://www.sciencedaily.com.

3 "Gamma-ray bursts: New observations illuminate the most powerful explosions in the universe." Scientific American - July 1997.

4 The New York Times,

by J. Glanz - May 30, 2000.

5 "Physicists confirm prediction on quantum teleportation"

Science Daily - February 12, 1998 .

6 "Accelerating the cosmos - Cosmologists have discovered a new kind of energy that is speeding up the universe's expansion," by J. Glanz. Astronomy - October, 1999.