The Cosmic Lattice

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, we have other interesting developments. A short time ago, the Kryon group suggested we watch for what is known as the “binocular viewing” of our cosmos – that is, ground-based observation stations paired with space-based stations. As of 1998, that’s exactly what we now have.7 As the first scattered pieces of the puzzle have arrived from the pairing
of these two types of observational stations, it is not surprising to me that at
the same time, worldwide, a new paradigm is emerging. For example, independent researchers from the National Science Foundation and the Berkeley National Laboratories have announced recent evidence on the distribution of “dark matter.” 8, 9 Furthermore, in many circles the evidence is considered overwhelming that there is indeed a huge amount of energy known as Einstein’s “lambda” – or the mysterious force that pushes matter apart and keeps gravity from collapsing all matter into itself, and that it’s magnetic! 10
On top of that, we now have researchers stating that the universe itself not only has shape but also direction, which before now was simply unheard of. 11
Finally, as if all of the above were not enough, astronomers from the Max Planck Society recently released a large 3D “picture” of a huge portion of the observable universe, generated by a supercomputer complete with a complex web of “walls and filaments” discovered in recent galaxy maps. 12

Well, well, well! Since we now have a “binocular telescope” that is larger than the Earth itself, I truly believe we will soon see even more startling and firm evidence for a “lattice” of energy throughout our universe. I also have a few ideas of how the above discussion of gamma rays, the Big Bang theory, and the speed of light tie into this. Look for the varying time frames (speed of light) of areas of the universe to correspond to the shape we will soon see. Look also for evidence of creative events (“Big Bangs”) linked to the shape and time frame of these different areas, too.

Human Biology

Well, enough about astronomy! How ‘bout human biology, a subject near and dear to all our hearts...so much has happened in the last four years, that it’s really been hard for me to keep up with the literature. Every time I turn around there seems to be yet another breakthrough, yet another area in which the impossible is not just possible, but imminent. One of the areas that I love to keep up on is the area of our DNA. Since it’s also such a favorite of the Kryon group, this seems a good place to begin.

DNA. There are three major things that seem to dovetail about this topic, and all seem to be inextricably linked:

1) RNA, the “messenger” of our DNA, has been shown to mutate and change based on stress hormone levels in humans; 13

2) DNA, as well as the function of whole organ systems, have been shown to be: (a) magnetized themselves, 14,15 and (b) also affected by surrounding magnetic fields in our environment; 16,17,18

3) DNA has now been shown to exist in a loop, not as a linear strand.19,20
The most striking things that come from this information is that not only do our internal stress levels deeply affect the actions of our cells at the level of DNA
and RNA, so does our surrounding magnetic environment! The mind-body link (stress levels) and the magnetic-body link (environment) are both coming to the forefront – “within, so without.” The Kryon group has been saying for
years that we are affected by our internal beliefs as well as our external environment, and here it is in “living color.” It seems the next large step is
to link the two in order to show that the internal affects the external and
vice versa.

Another point which really stands out is how the Kryon group has also been saying for years that the DNA is magnetized, and that it “resonates” as a crystal would (metaphorically), and the proof of this is given above. What remains is to examine how magnetic energy might change DNA, which will also lead to evidence of many more “strands” than previously thought. For example, if we use magnetic energy and examine changes in the DNA chemistry, where might this “stamped” information be coming from? What happens when we end up seeing that DNA is nothing more than an elegant high-tech information processing unit, and that it’s being fed information from “somewhere?”

There’s so much here, I can’t begin to do it justice. As we begin in earnest to examine what happens when magnetized light hits DNA ( a good example is light we call “laser”), we will create more questions than answers. Besides “magical” healings at the genetic level, our scientists will have to admit there’s more to the “superconductor DNA coils” than meets the eye. At some point, multidimensionality will have to enter the picture in order to adequately explain the DNA phenomena we will soon see. Multidimensional theories are already being taken seriously by astronomers and particle physicists alike, some displaying evidence of up to eleven dimensions so far in their investigations. 21, 22 On top of all that, DNA maps are almost complete (96% last time I checked my local newspaper). Once researchers have the genome sequence firmly in hand, there are some puzzles in store, ones that suggest some sort of deliberate “tampering.” For example, why would there be such weird sequencing of amino acids that shut off nerve regeneration within the human central nervous system (brain and spinal cord), but not totally in the peripheral nervous system, while so-called “lower” forms of life have this regeneration (both central and peripheral) at their disposal?
This DNA sequencing will also once and for all settle the question of just how “old” us present-day humans are. Already there is evidence based on partial gene sequencing which suggests that modern humans emerged between 100,000 and 150,000 years ago, according to Sarah Tishoff of Penn State. 23 Indeed, there is now evidence that we emerged along side other humanoid forms almost spontaneously during this time frame. 24

TO BE CONTINUED ...

References

7 “First images from telescope larger than Earth reveal ancient quasars,” ScienceDaily – September 18, 1998. Source: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, http://www.sciencedaily.com.

8 “Astrophysicists detect cosmic shear, evidence of dark matter,” ScienceDaily – May 11, 2000. Source: National Science Foundation,

9 “Dark energy fills the cosmos,” ScienceDaily – May 26, 1999. Source: Berkeley National Laboratory,
.
10 “Intergalactic magnetism runs wide and deep,” by P. Weiss. ScienceNews – May 6, 2000, Vol. 157.

11 “Does the cosmos have a direction?” by R. Cowen. ScienceNews – April 26, 1997, Vol. 151.

12 “For the first time, a computer simulates the evolution of a large fraction of the whole observable universe,” ScienceDaily – February 26, 1998. Source: Max Planck Society, .

13 “Control of alternative splicing of calcium channels by stress hormones,” by J. Xie & D. McCobb. Science -- April 17, 1998, Vol. 280(5362).

14 “DNA conductors,” by H. Schlesinger. Popular Science – August, 1999.

15 “Researchers suggest new mechanism to explain DNA charge transfer process,” ScienceDaily –
July 22, 1999. Source: Georgia Institute of Technology, .

16 “Magnetic fields diminish drug action,” by J. Raloff. ScienceNewsOnline – November 29, 1997, http://www.sciencenews.org.

17 “EMF’s biological influences,” by J. Raloff. ScienceNewsOnline – January 10, 1998, http://www.sciencenews.org

18 “EMFs – Doubts linger over possible risks,” by J. Raloff. ScienceNews – July 3, 1999, Vol. 156.

19 “Closing the loop on the end of a chromosome,” ScienceNews – May 22, 1999, Vol. 155.

20 “Discovery: Chromosomes found to end in big loops,” ScienceDaily – May 17, 1999. Source: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, .

21 “Hunting for higher dimensions,” by P. Weiss. ScienceNews – February 19, 2000, Vol. 157.

22 “What shape is the universe? Columbia astronomers have clue,” ScienceDaily – February 17, 1998. Source: Columbia University, .

23 ”Little-explored African genetic diversity may hold key to human origins, medical questions.” ScienceDaily – January 25, 1999. Source: Penn State, .

24 “Once we were not alone,” by I. Tattersall. Scientific American – January, 2000, Vol. 282(1).